Rocket Bomber - commentary

Emma MMF: Oh, and about that biplane...

filed under , 9 March 2010, 19:35; byline — Matt Blind

Remember this?

EmmaVol1Pg31Panels4-7

Not being the right kind of geek, I didn’t know which plane that was, but I knew it wasn’t 19th century — no matter how late in that century we’d care to look.

So I put the question to my research staff [uclue.com] and got the answer back last night:

Uclue Guru Byrd (and by the way, if “Uclue Guru” isn’t the official job title, you guys need to fix that.) who is, in fact, an aviation enthusiast and pilot, went above and beyond and besides in tracking down the answer to my simple question. I’m about to quote liberally from his answer, because I paid for it.

First of all, the story takes place in the 1890s. The earliest biplanes
were built during that decade, so the timeframe is slightly plausible.
However, the design of the first biplanes were nothing like the one in the
drawing. See this account with images of the Wright Brothers first biplane,
built in 1899:
http://www.fi.edu/flight/first/before.html

Here are a couple more links showing early biplanes from approximately the
same era:

“Biplane Glider of Octave Chanute, c1896 (1910)”
http://www.heritage-print.com/pictures_1229916/biplane-glider-of-octave-chanute-c1896-1910.html

“1900’s Wright Glider”
http://www.playle.com/listing.php?i=NKYPHOTOS120&PHPSESSID=a

1910 Bristol Box Kite
http://www.military-aircraft.org.uk/other-military-aircraft/bristol-boxkite.htm

You’ll notice these very early biplanes look much different than the one in
the “Emma” drawing, which would be actually quite futuristic for the time
in which the story is set. Apparently this fact was noticed by others
also.

In one review of the comic, the reviewer says, “the toy biplane on pg. 31 is
an anachronism,” which of course means something that cannot have existed
at the time stated.
http://www.rocketbomber.com/2010/03/07/emma-mmf-daily-diary-vol-1

[oh, yeah, I got a chuckle out of that bit.]

Apparently the author, or at least her staff agreed, as in a future edition
of Emma, according to another commenter, “Kaoru Mori got it half-wrong …
but the staff of the anime corrected her error. The anime still had a
flying model aircraft, but they replaced her relatively futuristic biplane
with a model of the Aerial Steam Carriage, an 1840s design that didn’t
fly but might have been known about by at least a few people (there was an
aviation display at the Crystal Palace, even if controlled, powered flight
had yet to occur):
http://etonia.wordpress.com/2010/01/04/review-emma-vols-1-2/

According to this Wikipedia article, author Kaoru Mori attempted in Emma
“to recreate 1895 London with meticulous detail.” However, since there were
no biplanes flying around London in 1895, it’s obvious that she could not
have drawn an actual biplane from that time and place.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_(manga)

After a little discussion, and the conclusion that it wasn’t an actual production model (or prototype) and certainly wasn’t extant in 1895, I asked Byrd to pick a date: He came back with:

Hi Mblind,

I’m glad you were pleased with the research and information. I believe the
closest matches to the Emma drawing might be the Avro 504 (1916), the
Bristol Fighter (1916), and the Gotha Bomber (early 1917). Therefore my
best guess as to the vintage of the biplane in the Emma drawing would be
mid-WWI or 1916.

No insult or accusation is aimed at Mori in the case. It’s a great art detail, and also says quite a bit about both William and the Joneses, in just a single page. We’ll squint a bit and pretend it’s not 21 years too early.

##

I’ve used Uclue before (for one of the rethinking the box columns, among other things) and let me again restate my recommendation: it’s a great service, and they have excellent staff, and the turnaround time [in my experience] is usually just 24 hours.

Click here for the archive of all Emma Manga Moveable Feast links



Recycling: Actually, yes, an accelerated release schedule is one of those things that will help manga sales.

filed under , 1 March 2010, 22:43; byline — Matt Blind

An announcement on the recent Tokyopop Insider webcast/webinar/whatever that Gakuen Alice would see accelerated release (along the lines of—but not to the extent of—Viz’s Naruto and One Piece initiatives) combined with this post from Manga Widget reminded me quite strongly of a post I wrote 27 July 2008 — no, you don’t have to click that last link, I’m about to re-post the pertinent bits below.

There are factors that make a manga more appealing to your average shopper. In true game fashion, I’d describe these as “attack bonuses” or “force multipliers”

From the Jul 08 article:

Manga Force Multipliers
also known as ‘intangible sales factors’

Cartoon Network Afternoon Anime Broadcast:
Instant Win. Hire another two translators to get the books out faster, and hire an accountant to count the money,

Adult Swim 10pm Broadcast
+5

Adult Swim 11pm Broadcast
+3

Adult Swin post-Midnight Broadcast
+2

Other Cable Broadcast
+1

New. (volume released in the past month)
+1

Volume Five.
The customers like longer series: part of that is the appeal of long-running stories; mostly it’s that 5 volumes take up at least 4 inches of shelf space and combined with even rudimentary graphic design a block like that will catch the customers eye. +1

Frequency.
Viz has capably proven that releases every other month seem to engage the fan base moreso than titles that slowly exit the gate at the rate of 2 or 3 a year. The average 14-year-old fan just can’t wait that long — their interests change before you can get the next book out and into their greedy mitts. If you’re Dark Horse and you’re selling to the 30-year-old-with-a-14-year-old-mindset the math is different, but most publishers need to pump the volumes out faster. Bi-monthly merits a +5, 4-a-year gets you +1, anything else is a push (or a negative).

Anime available on DVD
+2

Anime available as a Fansub
+8

Sucks. Yes. But this is our customer base. They also hang out in the aisles, reading reading reading without buying anything. Cheap frickin’ bastards, the lot of them. It is what it is, though: We’re looking to capture the percentage that buys, not the rest, and shop-wear and unwrapped 18+ titles are just the cost of doing business.

And yet, I have a dream… a GN-only store that would not only cater to these sponges, but would sell them coffee and pastries until they do come around to buying the books they read.

related:

Manga available as scanlation
+1

This kinda-sorta-helps but not for the reason you think: it’s not that online comics sap legitimate bookstore sales, it’s that we hate hate hate reading comics online. Give us the anime adaptation, or give us a book. …there is no such thing as bad publicity, though; An online manga is just a teaser: If a person is ever going to buy a book than a scanlated chapter merely whets the appetite. The rest weren’t going to buy it anyway.

Fansubs are a different model: online video might as well be DVD for most consumers. It takes an exceptionally bad sub (or shite video quality) to keep a fan from downloading. A significant fraction download anyway (and complain about the legitimate DVD dubs and subs not being ‘authentic’ on forums).

(I can’t explain that, and won’t try)

##

Proofs:
Cartoon Network Afternoon Anime Broadcast: Pokemon
Adult Swim 10pm Broadcast: (historically) Dragon Ball Z, Inuyasha
Adult Swim 11pm Broadcast: Bleach
Adult Swin post-Midnight Broadcast: Death Note
Other Cable Broadcast: numerous 3rd tier titles on AZN, Jetix, Sci-fi, Starz, Toon Disney and ABC Family — take yer pick.
New: you know, I’ve started posting these weekly.
Volume Five: Vampire Knight
Frequency: Duh. Naruto
Anime available on DVD: many previously cited, also Fullmetal Alchemist, Full Metal Panic, and .hack//
Anime available as a Fansub: right now? Rosario+Vampire
Manga available as scanlation: Any. Naruto and Negima spring immediately to mind, however.

That’s only my take on it.

And 20 months on, I think this is still a fair take on the popularity of some titles vs others.



Rethinking the Box: Good Problems to Have.

filed under , 18 February 2010, 11:37; byline — Matt Blind

I complain a lot about work. A Lot. Retail is a rough job, and we have to smile while doing it — in the face of some some of the worst customer behaviors and unreasonable (nigh impossible) expectations.

Dealing with the public Sucks. You Suck.
—but before you respond in the comments (again) to tell me how awful I am, as a retailer and as a human being (again) y’all need to read the whole article.

##

Rethinking the Box is a collection of ruminations on retail: a unique combination of sober (and sobering) business analysis mixed with drunken, inflammatory personal invective.

Previously:
Study your History. Recognise your Motives. Location, Location, Location. Know your Customer Base, and your Staff. Find your Niche. Consider your Product Lines, Stock Your Shelves, Consider alternative display strategies, take a second look at What the Customers Want, and then stare again in dismay at the Profit Margins. Try calculating your upper-limit affordable rent and the revenue from inventory (with a side of coffee) and compare your numbers to average industry per-storefront sales.

##

Gods, work sucks.

First, the phone rings off the hook — even on a slow day we’ll get 12 to 15 calls an hour — but around half of these are simple to deal with (Yeah, we’re located just 2 miles south of the mall, and we’ve been here in the same damn spot for 15 effing years already) or obvious (you just listened to a recording where I myself, being the only poor bastard who knows how the ancient PBX board works so I’m the only one who can record the greeting, just told you of both our address and normal store hours — give me a mo, I can even rattle off the script from memory, “We’re open Mondays thru Thurdays 9 AM to 10 PM, Fridays and Saturdays 9 AM to 11 PM, and on Sundays from 9 to 9. If you’d like to speak to a bookseller, please remain on the line.” Do you really need to talk to me in person to verify that yes, we’ll be open until 10pm?) or the people calling actually know the title&author of the book they want. The other half of phone calls? Pure Retail Hell.

We’re not freaking Information; we sell books. But over the past decade I’ve been asked to answer over the phone:

  • artist & CD from half a lyric
  • plot synopses, major characters, and critical review for a number of titles.
  • sales figures for bestsellers, “Sure, it’s number 1. Say, just how many books is that?”
  • address and operating hours of my competition, the other bookstore up the street. (not at the end of a conversation, when I couldn’t otherwise help a customer… no. this was the first damn question out of his mouth.)
  • availability of a book in one of our branches 5 states and 1000 miles away.
  • conversion from Celsius to Fahrenheit
  • name and number for a local cake shop for a customer in New Jersey who wanted to send her son a birthday cake.
  • “How do I get my book published?”
  • related: detailed explanations on how the publishing industry works, how our distribution chain works, why the ‘services’ offered by so-called self-publishing companies aren’t quite the same as actually being published, and why I can’t order your book into the store.
  • “I have a book, how do I schedule a book signing?”
  • related: if your business model relies on getting an ‘event’ at one local bookstore where you might sell 5 copies of your self-published book — you’re doing it wrong and your model is broken. Sure, you hear about famous authors doing book signings all the time but correllation is not causation and those authors aren’t famous because of the signing — in fact the exact opposite is true: we only bother with the in-store event because the author is famous… or internet ‘famous’, or they were just on TV. [here’s your tip: instead of calling poor, overworked booksellers to get into the bookstore, you need to expend your energy calling producers and scheduling directors trying to get on TV — or take the whole thing onto the internet, post YouTube videos and to your own blog, build up an audience (and a conversation with that audience). But I can’t teach marketing over the telephone. The most I can do is say, “no. sorry”

You might have noticed, with that last pair of questions-and-comments, that there is a wide swath of the general public that has no idea how the book business works but still wants in and their only recourse is to contact the one part of the industry that they know about: the book store.

When they’re lucky, I’m the schlub who picks up the phone at their local, as I actually can explain a bit about how both book publishing and book retail works. [note: I don’t get paid any extra for this.] 99 times out of a 100 though, I’m not sure what kind of response these poor misguided souls get for their heart-felt inquires, as they only want to make a book — but apparently they can’t rub two brain cells together to use Google (and other internet resources) to find this crap out for themselves. (or, you know, come into the store to read the books I have on publishing, maybe even buy a few.) I am of course a bit wary of the actual ‘books’ that may be in the offing (if they have a completed work, and aren’t just looking for what they think is easy money in the book biz) but who knows? There may be a future Pulitzer Prize winner who is just a luddite and doesn’t know any better — but even if one hates and avoids the internet, 30 years ago the model was not, ‘call a book store’ — you sent the manuscript to publishers (or maybe an agent) and you did the leg work and you followed up. These days you’re better off getting an agent first, but I can guarantee top-flight agents are not going to be answering the phone at the bookstore.

To just call your local branch of Big Box Books and all-but-demand publication, fame, and fortune smacks not only of laziness but also of hubris. I’m not Barnum or Svengali or Pearlman or a Faustian devil — the fame-n-fortune contract is outside my purview — I sell books, it’s all I do, and by “sell” I mean ‘take money in exchange for merchandise’, if you need someone to market your books that’s a different skill set and it pays a lot more per hour than my current salary.

Anyway, that’s just the crap I deal with over the telephone.

##

Customers in store are just as bad, if not occasionally worse.

They can’t remember a title, or author (or both). Sometimes what they do remember is just wrong. Sometimes all we have to go on is a subject, or a concept, or half a detail (“The author’s first name is Jim, or Jack, or Jan, or Johann — something like that.”) Of course, most shoppers who actually make it into the store have a better idea of what their looking for (since there is a big difference between picking up the phone and driving into town) but there are some who are just there to meet a friend, or who have an hour to kill before an appointment, or the kid needs a book for school and while the fam is in store maybe one of the ‘rents asks about the latest thriller or what was on Oprah or whatever.

When we can succeed at the searches, we feel like Bookstore Gods™ and it almost, almost makes up for the other 95% of stupid questions from the general book-store-going public.

##

Here’s the thing:

The phone is ringing off the hook. During the rush, we not only have people walking up to our info desk, we have a line and we’re on the PA paging for backup to the desk, or the registers, or both.

These are great problems to have.

There is no such thing as too much traffic. Sure, if it continues like this day after day for more than a few hours, then we need to hire more staff and that’s also a great problem to have.

The things I complain about at work are the sorts of things other retailers would give their eye teeth for. (Or, they’d punch me in the face hard enough to dislodge dental work and they’d give my eye teeth for a tenth of that business.)

The phone keeps ringing not even because folks happen to have our business card or they’ve read our ads (we barely advertise, amazing for a multi-billion-dollar retail corporation), but because an internet search or the yellow pages or a call to 411 directory assistance gave them our number. When they think bookstore, they are already thinking Big Box Books and there is little we have to do (or can do, really) to either augment or mitigate this never ending stream of phone calls.

[aside: OK, so my store is listed first, so maybe we have to deal with more idiots potential customers than the other branches of Big Box Books in town, but still.]

Opening an independent store means giving this up. It’ll take decades to build up awareness in the community, and even then I’d still be competing against Big Box Books. Believe me, I still want to run my own shop — I’d love to own my own bookstore — but I’m not fooling myself into thinking I can match the sales of the majors, even if I have a larger, better store, because it just doesn’t work that way for a start-up.

If you’ve defined your niche and you can out-do the big boxes in your chosen category, then over time you will find your customers (rather, they’ll find you) and five years down the road you’ll be performing much better. So, what’s your plan to stay open for those 5 years? Or for 3 years? Or even until next year?

##

Reputation, name-recognition, and community goodwill are all intangibles that can’t be bought. What can you do?

Be the Best There Is at What You Do.

  • Be open, and inviting. This may mean: being open for business earlier and later than the competition, having more comfy chairs or tables (and outlets!), or being just plain prettier than the corporate cookie-cutter retailer out by the mall.
  • Hire better staff, and pay them more.
  • Sell coffee, and cake. Host book clubs. Sponsor literary events; if you can’t find any to sponsor, heck, invent a few, advertise ‘em, run ‘em out of your storefront. The idea is to pull people into the store.
  • Keep the shelves stocked. Nothing sells books like more books. Build taller bookcases, cram bookcases into every available space, stock used books if you have to — just make it look like you have every available book in the universe (or at least, every book in your niche) and believe me, people will talk about it.
  • Broadcast. Do whatever you can to get the word out: blogs, social media, print ads, radio ads, stunts, contests; a kick-ass, usable, and useful website; everything and anything you can think of right up to and including a bigger, brighter sign out front.

About the only thing you can’t do is try to compete with the major chains on price. Even Big Box Books is getting undercut by CostCo, Amazon, and Wal-Mart. So sell everything else: the experience, the ambience, the service — if you’re selling coffee and cake, make sure both are better; if you’re open all hours and have comfy chairs, don’t be stingy or grudging or condescending towards the customers who are going to take advantage of that.

[I’ve some work to do myself re: that last point]

I said intangibles can’t be bought; but they’re also not free. This is going to cost you, either in money or in time. If you have decades to scrape by and barely make ends meet until you are in fact a fixture in your community, then fine, you can likely earn your reputation on the cheap — but I don’t have that kind of time (and at least in Atlanta, I can’t buy out another bookstore that has been built up over decades). Invest in the storefront, invest in stock, invest in your staff (keep ‘em happy) and eventually you’ll see the results in your bottom line — just not in the first year.



7 Tips for Bloggers

filed under , 11 February 2010, 22:23; byline — Matt Blind

In the same vein as the 7 tips for Podcasting (and with the same hubris and drunken bravado that fuelled that previous post) let me force some more unsolicited advice on an uncaring internet:

Seven Tips for Quasi-Successful Blogging.

1. Blogging isn’t writing.

Oh, it sure looks like writing, but one can just post links, or original art, or embed videos, or even set up a bot to steal the first couple of paragraphs of other people’s carefully-crafted blog posts, with a link, and as far as the internet is concerned it still looks, walks, and quacks like a blog.

unless your name is John Scalzi, I don’t even think you can make the argument that blogging is writing practice — and John’s professional writing is world’s away (Sci-fi; so I mean that literally) from whatever -even though both are entertaining. There are two different skill sets, and the blog post is a new form that doesn’t exactly or correctly correspond to previous literary forms ( of similar length: serialized novel, short story, poetry) and so, it’s not writing.

[one can blog poetry & short stories, or even publish a novel in serial form on a blog because the-blog-as-platform is quite flexible — but now you’re considering blogging-as-publishing models — and blogging still isn’t writing.]

2. Blogging isn’t journalism.

Sure, journalists can blog. And the results are grand.

And bloggers can blog about the news of the day — and offer opinions, commentary, and in-depth analysis of that news. Sometimes, that analysis (like, say, fivethirtyeight.com) is even better than news, since without the constraints of the page or the limits of both editorial and ownership, a blogger can say what she likes for as long as she likes and can use the new form to link to extended sources, obscure resources, other blogs, or even the ‘real’ output of ‘real’ journalists that happens to be published to the web (provided some luddite who doesn’t understand the new public dialog hasn’t thrown up a paywall or pulled the newspaper article entirely).

In some ways, blogging can be better than journalism. And eventually, blogging may evolve into the sort of publicly-trusted role now occupied by journalists. It’s going to take time, though, and so long as serious news blogs still have to compete with, say, kittyhell.com for the attention of the audience, we’re not there yet.

[of course, this exact match up — news vs entertainment — has plagued every media ever invented. And the related issues when it comes to news — trust, veracity, significance, depth — are things which must be either earned from or proven to an audience. —you can insert your own Fox News/MSNBC/liberal media/vast-right-wing-conspiracy jokes here—

Trust is to be earned one person at a time. Blogs are still in early stages yet; to commit the sin of quoting myself, “to completely discard out of hand the efforts of internet writers as amateurish and non-professional (which, admittedly a lot of it is) is the same as only looking at the history of newspapers from 1605 to 1700.”

The potential is there, but we’re not journalists yet.]

3. Blog What You Know.

Yes, I’m just trotting out hoary advice that was old when the ‘penguin joke’ was young, and may even date back to a much earlier epoch when the penguin joke was actually considered to be funny.

Write what you know.

Now, you might say to yourself, “All I do is get drunk and watch TV every night.”

Actually, that concept (let’s call it drunkville) has a potential audience some hundred- or thousand-times bigger than the meagre readership of this blog.

“All I do is eat pizza”

If you compulsively seek out new pizza places around town, and review them, and are serious about pizza, then hell: you have a blog.

“All I do is read the anime and watch the manga” [sic]

You’re in good company.

“All I do is watch sports”

Heck, you don’t just have a blog, you might have a job waiting at the local AM Fan radio station!

“All I do is bitch about random stuff, without offering solutions.”

…So Say We All.

Blog what you know. Keep at it. You’ll either find your audience (or it will find you) or you’ll get bored and move on. But for every bored quitter, there’s a failblog or a cakewrecks, or a fark — and some of these tossers have book deals.

4. Feed the Dog.

There’s a vaguely remembered blog post from a couple years back that is going to take me an inordinate amount of time to track down again (and I gave it a shot, but in the three? years since I first read it there have been a whole lotta web sites using the search terms ‘blog’ and ‘feed’ in an increasingly casual manner; Google can not help in this instance)

Anyway, said columnist pointed out that a blog is a lot like a dopey Labrador Retriever: you have to exercise it, and you have to feed it once a day. [think of a blog as a really complicated tamogotchi, if you don’t play with it and feed it, it dies]

Even if all you can manage is a short link-blogging post, or a funny video, you should post something daily, to give your regular readers a reason to come back.

Daily.

[you’ll note I don’t follow my own advice on this one.]

5. There are no limits:

I mean, *I* blog about retail, publishing, manga, comics; on odd occasions I’ll take a stab at politics or just the plain funny…

6. But Keep On Topic.

…and all that said, I still “Blog what I know” and almost all posts are related, in a broad manner: If I post about politics, it’s about copyright issues; if I blog about popular culture, it’s either a book or based on a book; and no matter what else I write about — in the end it boils down to Books. I love books. I sell books for a living, I compulsively read—and buy—books to the extent that storage becomes a major issue and no matter what other noises I might make about anime (-adaptations of books) or TV (-adaptations of books) or movies (can you guess?) it all comes back to my first true love.

If you blog long enough (I’m on year 6, personally) then both your passion and topic will become clear to you.

And Keep It Fun.

Almost all of us aren’t paid to blog. We only do it so long as it keeps us amused, and even the paid contingent of bloggers are only able to maintain their high level of output because, on some level, they’re having fun. [that, or they’re true professionals who can write entertaining articles on any topic just because it’s their job and frankly, if true, that scares me a bit]

I have a full time job. It wears me out. I barely have time to keep up with everything I’d like to write about, but I keep blogging because I want to share, and because (even if I occasionally complain about the time commitment the blog requires) I’m still having fun doing it.



Never ask advice from a blogger, Part II

filed under , 6 February 2010, 23:51; byline — Matt Blind

[never ask advice from a blogger, as we tend to blog about it]

I don’t get these very often, but the occasional email is certainly worth it:

Sir,

My name is [redacted] and I am the president of [redacted], Ltd., a small [redacted]-based visual and audio entertainment company. I read through the three ways to contact you on your site and opted to take the easiest for all of us. I am seeking information about new comic book sales and noted in one of your posts that you track them. I was hoping you could give me some insight regarding a project we’re considering. Please forgive this inquiry if it is inappropriate but it seemed to touch your stated expertise.

We are planning a series of audio dramas and would like to concurrently release a series of 24 high-quality comic books, (36-42 pages each, average of 2 panels covering 1/6th the page (standard) and one covering 1/3rd (widescreen)). Our intent is to produce some good comics with lasting value to the owners while concurrently widening awareness of our audio series. We are also using both the comic and audio efforts to demonstrate the viability of film proposals based on the same theme. To this end, we aren’t looking to make money on the comics but we also don’t want to loose them either.

I’ve contacted a few of the comic producers and some have offered to create the artwork for the comic panels (digital versions) for an average rate of $500 per page.

Rightly or wrongly, we’ve been led to believe that a fair run for a new comic is 3000-5000 copies at an average price of $3.99 each. By our math, that means that even if we managed to get the distribution and printing services free, we’d at best just break even or would be losing about $8000 per comic released. Naturally, printers and distributors want their pay and cuts and I presume, if comics are like independent films, we’d expect to hand over at least half of the returns to the distributor for his time/advertising expenses. That changes our math to losing up to $16,000 per issue of what would be titled a “successful” comic book.

My gutt feeling is also that these companies see us as something of a money pool from which they can fund or compensate for their other stressed efforts. I can’t prove this but its the impression I get from talking with their editors.

Associates we have in the music industry have told us to go direct to the distributors but since we don’t have any established connections with them, and don’t know the ground rules of the comic business, we aren’t sure if such a thing is feasible or common or even whom to go about contacting other than blind e-mails to the companies.

We can afford to finance the artwork and printing independently if such an option seems more viable. We don’t want to get stuck with an unsellable product due to the hidden conditions of the comic book world.

We’d appreciate any insight you could offer us as we’re sure our understanding must be skewed or we wouldn’t be getting some of the answers we’re getting. Of course, we’d apprecite tips to any connections you may know whom would be interested in such a venture for its own merits rather than merely as an influx of money. Mostly, we’d like to get your opinions and insights to our situation.

Thank you in advance for your time and consideration.
[ID info redacted]

##

Oh, where to start…

Dear querent,

I’m not an expert, or a sir, but I can try to help you out anyway.

First: What I track through my site are online sales, like those through Amazon and others, but since I’m not privy to actual sales (I get the data I need by looking at what is publicly posted each day on Amazon et al.) I’m not sure how much I can help on this one.

That said, it seems you are in need of at least one correction, re: comics as cross-promotional vehicles:

Unless the comics are already made, you’re chasing diminishing returns: Sure, you might think comics are just an afterthought, or an add-on, or good exposure, but in fact comics are their own thing — and when done correctly, they require professional writers, artists, and full time editorial support. And you can’t make comics by looking at rates per page, or costs for a print run of 5000 copies (or 10000 copies) as the industry doesn’t work like that.

Comics are still books, stand-alone products with their own writers and artists and audience. If you want to tap that audience, instead of making your own books, you’d be much better served by buying advertising space in existing titles. This will be cheaper, too.

If you want to make comics, that’s great. But I don’t feel you can make ‘comics’ as an appendix to some other project, and I think the math you’ve already done will prove that to you.

Comics are not ads. They’re not marketing. If you’d like to publish a book, comics or otherwise, you’ll be entering a field with which you have no experience. A decade ago, marketing was all about Push — getting the message out on as many platforms as possible. And this was a fine model for the last century, when the only models were broadcast models — a top down approach where your customers are all passive members of an audience. The internet (and even current advertising) has shown that push-marketing doesn’t always work, and that if you’re serious about doing a comic of your property, you need to consider “pull” and “buy-in” on social media platforms.

Unfortunately, “pull” and “buy-in” are not something you can just throw money at — not even if you’re willing to subsidise your own comic book in an attempt to reach this market. People have to like — and want — what you’re selling, and this is a much harder proposition.

I wish you luck. But merely considering a ‘comic’ version of your project and emailing some random blogger isn’t going to get you there.



Rethinking the Box: The Multiple Paradoxes of Coffee Table Books.

filed under , 6 February 2010, 15:13; byline — Matt Blind

first and foremost: there is no such thing as a “Coffee Table Book” — sure, I know what you mean and like art (or porn) we all know it when we see it, but I’ll be damned if any publisher cites these as a category or format. It’s a descriptor like Sedan or Compact or ‘family car’ — it can mean a lot of things depending on who is using the term.

##

Rethinking the Box is a collection of ruminations on retail: a unique combination of sober (and sobering) business analysis mixed with drunken, inflammatory personal invective.

Previously:
Study your History. Recognise your Motives. Location, Location, Location. Know your Customer Base, and your Staff. Find your Niche. Consider your Product Lines, Stock Your Shelves, take a second look at What the Customers Want, and then stare again in dismay at the Profit Margins. Try calculating your upper-limit affordable rent and the revenue from inventory (with a side of coffee) and compare your numbers to average industry per-storefront sales.

[yes, the intro gets longer with each post; but the one time I omitted the context all hell broke loose.]

##

In the last column I outlined a strategy for stocking graphic novels. (an expensive strategy but one that corrects for errors and accomodates certain customer behaviours such that at least one copy of a book is always available *and* where it should be on the shelf, so we can sell it. Buy 3 to sell 1, heh, everything old is new again…)

My “Illustrated Empire” is to be more than just a comic shop, though; in the August inventory post I outlined quite a few categories [Art Surveys and Collections, Art Technique, Architecture, Graphic Design, Fashion, Photo Essay, & ‘Coffee Table’ Travel] that are broadly related to each other in as much as each category is primarily made up of large format, full-colour, expensive hardcover books. These things are heavy, printed on glossy clay paper, tend to run into the hundreds of pages in Quarto or Folio editions, or larger, or odd custom trim sizes, and all in all they’re a pain in the ass.

You’ll need custom shelving for these (or at least, not standard book shelves) as a 4-foot run of art books can weigh 300+ pounds and they tend to overhang standard 6-8” deep shelving by at least a third. For those of you who haven’t moved outside of the graphic-novel corner of your local Big Box Books for more than a cup of coffee, let me put it in perspective: those slipcased, over-sized Absolute Editions DC is so proud of? Imagine 150 linear feet of shelving on a wall 30 ft. long in bookcases 7 ft. high, full of nothing but Absolute DC.

It’s heavy. It’s impressive.

It’s the Architecture section at my branch of Big Box Books — and I know my store is atypical; most stores would be lucky to have one or two bookcases while I have ten, and this is just architecture. I’ve a similar run of Art books, and Interior Design, and smaller runs of things like Photography and Graphic Design.

It’s an odd confluence of being within easy driving distance of both Ga. Tech (with their fine College of Architecture) and the Atlanta campus of SCAD, while also located just down the street from a neighborhood full of Coke-stock-beneficiaries who have little to do but redecorate their mansions once a year.

…between them, and the students, and the homeless, on top of the usual slate of both the casual shopping public and die-hard bookstore junkies, it’s an unusual place to work. —but it might also explain some of my odd perceptions of the business & our customer base [posted previously].

Anyway, when I say you can stock 4,000 large-format, high-price-point “coffee table books” and you can make money doing it, I know whereof I speak.

The books themselves are the draw. Some of you may have been wiping drool off your chins already, after reading my description of a ton and a half of Art books alongside a ton and a half of Architecture titles. The problem, of course, is that casual browsing completely destroys the value of the book [even though the book itself is fine, and intact] and the physical weight of the books themselves will wreak havoc on flimsy dust jackets, or even occasionally the binding.

If it’s an $80 art book, and you have a choice between the fresh-out-of-the-box shrink-wrapped copy, and the one that has been knocking around my store for 2 years, the choice is obvious. The problem I run into, as a retailer, is that often this is the same copy: I have one copy. It’s still shrink-wrapped. Customer A wants it, but wants to look at it first. One time in twenty, they find a bookseller and ask, politely, if it’d be OK to unwrap the one copy in the store because, well, it’s an $80 book, right? Only fair to see what $80 buys. (The other 95% of the time a customer tears into the book anyway, and hides the plastic or cellophane behind other books — which means it’s not an unthinking act, as one went to lengths to hide the evidence)

Customer A unwraps the book, flips through it, decides no, not really, and puts the book back on the shelf.

Customer B, finding said “spoiled” copy, then brings it up to the desk and asks, “Hey, this is your last copy but it’s damaged, no really… can I get a discount?”

Customer A was functioning by their own logic, and Customer B certainly thinks their request is only reasonable, given the condition of the book [as noted above, even though the book itself is fine, and intact, and people attempt to return books for full credit that are in worse shape at least once a day] and this type of exchange is one of the reasons I drink heavily.

Since I don’t want to be an alcoholic [from stress; I’m perfectly fine being an alcoholic who drinks to celebrate the pure joy of being alive] obviously I would need to find a new way to merchandise these books.

##

Case 1: Open Shelves.

This is the situation described above. And books sell; it’s not the worse thing in the world. And, while not admitting anything about the performance of my store or revealing proprietary sales data my employer would rather I not post to a blog (sorry, had to say it) if you’ve the right kind of books and the right kind of market, then even with $50+ price points you can manage a turn ratio of 1: one book sold each year per book stocked. At $50 per, that ain’t bad at all.

Open shelving has the benefit of density (three tons of books, noted above) though you’re going to have to take some losses (or the publisher will, if they accept the damaged books back) and you’ll also have to invest quite a bit of payroll into maintenance: These sections are heavily browsed and almost universally, no one puts the book back where they found it. In those rare cases when a customer does reshelve a book it’s always wrong and more often we find a 70lb. stack on a table or bench at least 20 yards away from the section. Now we have to truck 70lb. up to the desk, to figure out where they go, and schlep the same 70lb. back to the section to reshelve them appropriately.

And we do this for each and every ‘coffee table book’ customer. Multiple times. Some customers really suck, you know?

Case 2: Buy 3 to Sell 1

…same logic as my Graphic Novel stocking strategy: one copy is mis-shelved, one’s been opened, but you should still be able to find a sealed copy to sell. You know, until someone unwraps that one too, “Oh, here’s one unwrapped already, but how will I know if the contents inside are the same unless I despoil this copy as well? I mean, that’s only logical.”

Case 3: Curated collections

Instead of stocking everything you can think to order, focus instead on 20, or 50, or 100 really great books. The trick here is picking what your customers will want, so you’ll need an expert on staff (if you’re not an expert yourself) but the main benefit is a much higher turn rate:

You’ve one ‘display’ copy, but 20 or even 50 copies still in the box. Your needy, grasp-y, greasy-fingered customer base can grope and paw the display copy all they want, and if they like it, you hand them the still-pristine copy from the top of the stack. For customers giving books as gifts, this is ideal. Repeat 5 times, and you’ve already done much better than the single copy alone would have done lost in a bookcase with other similar titles.

You don’t even need bookshelves for this — stock ‘em Crate & Barrel style: A fine easel or podium or table-top display, backed by cases of books to be sold.

A curated collection would need to be changed out frequently, so you’ll need to be on good terms with at least one publisher (Taschen and Phaidon spring immediately to mind, though there are others) as you’ll need a willing partner to accept the unsold stacks as returns, and as much advance information as possible to select books that might have sold 20-30 copies to begin with.

Case 4: Behind the Counter

Again, you’ll be looking at just 50-100 titles, but instead of out in the stacks where any hard-up homeless guy can flip through the Photography books because they happen to have nudes in them, you stock your expensive merch behind the registers (or behind some other counter) so they can only be browsed on request. This might save the books from some of the more, intensive, browsers but again limits your available selection from thousands to scant tens — maybe a hundred or so.

And unlike a curated collection, you don’t have duplicates to sell, just one of each.

“Behind the Counter” is the default for most stores, in fact. As a stocking ‘strategy’ it lacks quite a bit of sales potential; this is really more of a just-in-case purchase on the part of the bookstore or comic shop owner. “Oh, I need Absolute Watchmen and Marvel Premiere hardcovers and some Absolute Batman… just in case

You can write the investment off as ‘decoration’ — yes, these are expensive but some deluxe editions and figures and poly-bagged collectibles and maybe even some DVDs “behind the counter” lend the shop that “Android’s Dungeon” air: we’re serious about this, so serious we stock stuff we know won’t sell. Ever.

OK, let me dial that back a bit: There is nothing wrong with stocking specialty and high-price-point items. It’s commendable. In fact, I plan to do the exact same thing, but in a much higher volume store where, as a percentage of overall sales, not only does it make sense but might even be considered a requirement. (So, in an attempt to forstall comments that I know are coming: yes, your shop does quite well by these, but what of the strip-mall storefront comic shops that are just breaking even on periodical sales: do they need to invest in hardcover Hulk & Batman?)

Case 5: Closed-door Collections

Say you’ve a 20×60 room, bookcases on every wall, a few tables and comfy armchairs set up in the middle. Stack those bookcases with your Art and Artsy titles, and then put a lock on the door. Keys to be held by managers only.

This has the benefits of the Open Shelves model, above, in that you can really pack the books in. 4000 or 5000 different titles, depending on how tall your bookshelves are. You also have a degree of control over access, similar to a behind-the-counter model (though if you let one college student in, there will be 20 there before you can blink). And while this won’t stop the gradual degredation of your stock, by limiting access you might get another year or two out of the books — and even some sales of off-the-shelf, unwrapped copies, as they are still ‘like new’ as opposed to being ragged-looking shadows of their former selves.

And, since customers must ask for access and be granted such by an authority figure (inasmuch as a bookstore manager can invoke that authority) they will be more careful with the books. If a book is just sitting on a shelf that’s one thing; if someone has looked you in the eye and made note of your face before unlocking a door, that’s a completely different interaction.

[long aside:]
Given my past experience, I’m most immediately inspired by the Georgia Tech Architecture Library — it’s a small annex to the main library located in the CoA building, and if you didn’t know it was there, you’d never feel the lack. But for those who know to ask, it’s an invaluable resource, and for those-who-know keeping the library intact and in excellent shape is almost a calling. Books, particularly the over-sized and heavily illustrated volumes, are treated with care. Someone after you will need to look at these same pages, and it is our responsibility to make sure the volume survives for them.

I’d love to capture that same spirit, only, you know, with the add-on that I’d like to sell you that book if you happen to have $100.

Bookstores aren’t libraries. The general public hasn’t caught onto this yet (more the pity for libraries) but eventually the differences will become pronounced enough that the public has to take notice, or they won’t care, or e-books and the related dog-and-pony-circus will make make the point moot, or obscure the issue so that the role of libraries is either forgotten or discounted. And we’ll all be poorer for it.

Don’t mistake me: I’m a bookseller, and more than happy to take your money, and less happy but willing to take on some of the roles of a librarian if it means I can take even more of your money — but I know the function and role of libraries in society, and even if my customers don’t know and feel the loss, I do.

I think we can all see that retailers are not a cultural institution and, at least in Amazon’s case, can actively work against the public interest. (Though who is to say whose interest is served when two major corporations get into a spat over how the dollars are divvied.)

At any rate, I feel the need for an independent, academic repository of books — both informative and entertaining — that has nothing to do with profit motives or sales. We need libraries, or else the soul of our culture is dead.

[and note: Google isn’t going to be that “independent, academic repository” no matter how they try to spin it — but I don’t know what the solution actually is, or is going to be. Just commenting from the sidelines.]
[/long aside]

For my eventual bookstore, I’m leaning more and more toward these closed-door collections, and may have not one but four or five of these reading rooms, differentiated by subject.



Apple's Mad Genius

filed under , 28 January 2010, 12:20; byline — Matt Blind

So.

  • The iPod wasn’t the first MP3[AAC] player. It did everything other players did, just in a fancy case and with the Apple logo.
  • The killer app was iTunes. You buy the thing, & then you buy into the website [99 cents, score!], and Apple becomes a segment leader, a market leader, an industry leader (Music industry leader, not their primary market of hardware) and all of a sudden we’re living in Steve Job’s World and we’re not sure how we got here.

You don’t need iTunes to fill an iPod. You can rip CDs, you can buy music elsewhere, you can even pirate music if that is your chosen path. Apple made the right thing (paying for music) also the easy thing… and that has been good for record companies and extremely profitable for Apple. Next:

  • The iPhone wasn’t the first smart phone. It did everything other smart phones did, just in a fancy case and with the Apple logo.
  • Depending on your point of view, the iPhone didn’t even do things better. But it did everything well enough, and it was pretty, and easy, and easy for first time users to pick up.
  • The killer app was the App Store: no, really. Apple didn’t need to figure out everything we might want on a smart phone — I don’t know if a single company, no matter how smart, could have anticipated that. But by opening up the hardware (with caveats, and of course taking a cut from the top of any app sold) Apple—in a small, small way—handed the device back to the user and said, “Hey guys, we think this is cool: show us all the cool things you want to do with it.”
  • Apple controls a gate, the App Store, but has otherwise opened up the process to all comers. Given it’s critical mass of users (brought in by Apple fans and others willing to go with a ‘known brand’ as opposed to something new) both the user base and developer base is self-supporting at this point.
  • I think the ‘critical mass of users’ is the critical point. Google Android actually has more potential than the iPhone, given that (at least technically) it isn’t tied down to a single company, or type of hardware, or device — but even with the Google brand it’s going to take longer to hit critical mass. Eventually, Google will get there… but they don’t have Steve Jobs and his fanbase to effect a product launch that takes over the whole internet for five days.

Google is on the right track. They may even be smarter than Apple. The ironic twist is that the customer base, no matter how geeky, isn’t smart. We buy into celebrity, and glitz, and glamour, and established brands. It’s so very hard for any new brand to crack this market, no matter how good the product (which is why the manufacturer of new Joojoo tablet grossly, almost criminally underestimated the value of their one-time TechCrunch partner: Hardware is easy. Branding, and Market Awareness, is hard.)

And again: So.

  • The new iPad isn’t the first tablet, or netbook; it does everything other tablets and netbooks do, just in a fancy case and with the Apple logo.
  • Multi-touch, multi-gesture, “minority report” style interface is fine, and may even be ‘better’, but buttons and alt-keys and various computer mice have done the same thing for years. Not revolutionary, not evolutionary, just another way to access the computer, and while necessary once one eliminates a normal keyboard and mouse/touchpad/pointer— this isn’t the selling point Apple might like it to be.
  • My initial impression is that the iPad isn’t a computer, in as much as it doesn’t use MacOS but will instead run it’s own OS, and presumably with it’s own SDK. (If Apple has announced cross-platform support with iPhone apps, I didn’t see that press release — though it would be a great way to bootstrap iPad content and support with absolutely no effort required by Apple, past the software fix.)
  • iPod built on a decade of past consumer use: we wanted MP3/Audio Files, we were used to finding them on a computer, we had scads of files already — the iPod merely made them portable, and made carrying around an MP3 player cool.
  • iPhone was built on that concept of cool. It’s a geek device, but suddenly you weren’t a geek (per se) if you had one. Market penetration, and the previous success of the iPod, made the iPhone ‘normal’
  • Once the ‘geek curb’ is overcome, technology is no longer weird, but required. You can’t be cool without one. Apple overcame this barrier (and it was as much a barrier as the speed of sound to aircraft) but once jets can travel Mach 1 (or phones can read email, access GPS, get local weather, and enable IM) it is less a feat and more a matter of daily fact.

The next iteration is the iPad. As stated, it does everything other tablets and netbooks do, just in a fancy case and with the Apple logo.

But Apple has a way of leveraging these modest moves into established hardware with customer enthusiasm, large user bases, and (more-or-less) open 3rd-party developer involvement that makes their merely incremental improvements on existing hardware seem like revolutions.

And that is Apple’s Mad Genius.



Heck, I'm willing to go on the record with this, damn the torpedoes.

filed under , 26 January 2010, 22:49; byline — Matt Blind

Over at Anime Vice, Gia asked the question — “Do you think that lolicon and shotacon (e.g. hand-drawn materials featuring underage— sometimes VERY underage —characters in sexual situations) should be banned?”

And here’s my response:

So. I can point everyone to my ‘defense of porn’ post, again
http://www.rocketbomber.com/2009/01/10/5by8-29-the-blind-men-and-the-elephant-in-the-room

Unfortunately, I get a lot of mileage out of that link.

Specifically loli and shota porn though? I can’t speak to that. My gut says No.

Make that Hell No, no comics should be banned, ever, ever, unless a real life child was harmed by the artist in the process of creating the work in which case the censorship and/or destruction of that work should be a consequence of conviction for those crimes, along with things like prison and/or some other life-time supervision of the Creep Who Hurt Children.

Art does not hurt children. Drawings of people are not people. Creeps who hurt children will be creeps not matter what we publish, or don’t publish, and the major consideration is not their access to Art but their access to Children.

My head, in opposition to my gut, tells me the issue is more complex than that. And reactions by civilians and the Justified Outrage of the General Public whenever they come across material like this just makes the hobby look bad.

I just want to read books. All kinds of books. Anything that gets in the way of that is bad, in my opinion. We can question the motives of people who produce works that seemingly encourage Bad People to do Bad Things to children (“Think of the children!”) but I firmly believe that in a free society that encourages free speech, free thought, and free expression we cannot question their works as works. If you can prove a crime, with a real victim, then we can revisit the value of the work.

But Books don’t kill people. People who burn Books kill people. You want to ban something “for the common good”?

I find that to be as abhorrent as the worst, least defensible porn.



7 Tips for Podcasting.

filed under , 26 January 2010, 19:13; byline — Matt Blind

1. Select a topic carefully. You need something that you know about, and can talk about, but it should also be of interest to somebody else.

2. Frequency. Weekly posts are best. Regularly scheduled weekly posts that go live on time, at the same time and on the same day of the week each week are best. But find a schedule (however infrequent or erratic) and keep to it.

3. Solo or Group? Doesn’t matter so much, but Group podcasts are probably easier. (if you have friends) (you’ll note I record solo)

4. Format. I have a strong opinion: I feel podcasts should be in an accessible format & easily downloaded, not locked into a particular website or podcast host. In fact, I really like MP3.

5. Hardware. You don’t need a fancy mic. Here are some sample clips recorded with stuff I have around the house:

OK, so I do own a fancy mic (a shockmounted Blue Snowball atop a boom mic stand)

But I get about the same audio quality using the voice recording function on my Sansa Clip MP3 player. (The Sansa Clip comes highly recommended, particularly as a mobile solution or for journalists who need an easy way to record interviews.)

And I have the headset (mic and headphone combo) that came with my Rosetta Stone software. This piece of hardware doesn’t play well with my laptop, which I reference in the sound clip below; your mileage may vary.

6. Even an novice can snip long pauses and “ums” out in post-production. It doesn’t have to sound perfect right off the bat.

Tip Seven I snuck in at the end of the Summary: I use a free program called Audacity to record and edit, and also to encode the MP3s.

Summing Up:

Roll Credits:

Please note, future [official] podcasts will not be broken up into clips like this — it’ll be a single long file with appropriate download links and the like alongside the in-browser player. (It’ll look like a normal podcast in other words.) Before I start recording, though, I need to take my own advice: Pick a topic, decide on how frequently to post, and buckle down and do it.



← previous posts          

menu

home
about the site
about the charts
contact

Manga Moveable Feast: Emma

subscribe

RSS Feed Twitter Feed Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Add to Technorati Favorites!

categories

5by8
anime
bragging
business
comics
commentary
field reports
found
general fandom
linking to other people's stuff
manga
Manga Moveable Feast
publishing
rankings
retail
reviews
site news
snark
twitter
versus


-- not that anyone is paying me to place ads, but in lieu of paid advertising, here are some recommended links.--

support our friends

note: this comic is not about beer

note: this comic is not about Elvis

if I win the lottery, Bradley Schenck will be getting a pile of cash to redesign this site from scratch.

In my head, I sound like Yahtzee (quite a feat, given my inherited U.S.-flat-midwestern-accent.)

where I start my browsing day...

...and one source I trust for reviews, reports, and opinion on manga specifically...

...and where my casual browsing usually ends, past the research for various articles that I have to do each day.

Note: NSFW. Icarus, best described as "the Thinking Man's Porn Manga." Simon does me the undeserved favor of dropping free review copies my way, which I have callously ignored to date. Simon's blog is also a must-read, for a look at the manga industry from a small indy publisher's perspective. Plus, porn.

attribution

- Powered by Textpattern.
- Afterglow template ported by Stuart.

Top banner photo credits, from right to left:
- Soviet concept art vintage 1967, ganked from Dark Roasted Blend
- Excerpt of a souvenir card from the 1929 round-the-world flight of the LZ-127 Graf Zeppelin, ganked from Oldbeacon.com (via Metafilter)
- Goodyear Rocket Airship concept, posted in a 1958 Popular Mechanics article; ganked from online archives of the rec.aviation.military usenet group, found via GIS.
- Photo of the sculpture "Guard" by Hans van Bentem, located in Rotterdam, The Netherlands; ganked from Wikimedia Commons
- Soviet concept art from 1970, also ganked from Dark Roasted Blend
- Butt end of a R-7 Soyuz-class rocket booster of recent vintage, ganked from Michael Saxe at TravelBlog.
- Overlayed schematics, colour-inverted, of the Lippisch P-09 Rocket Plane, the Sänger-Bred Rocket Bomber, an unnamed heavy-tank-class mecha, and a second unnamed mecha in fighter-jet configuration (both anonymous to keep my ass from infringement -- and at that resolution & in combination I claim fair use as part of an artistic and satirical collage)
- Excerpt of "Dr. J.W. Mauchly makes an adjustment to ENIAC, the massive computer he designed to assist the U.S. military during World War II," ganked from Science Clarified
-- Logo art is original, credit M. Blind; logo created and photos composited in the Gimp 2.2